Proposing a
New Diagnosis and Theory for Patients with
Multiple Addictions By James Slobodzien,
Psy.D., CSAC
Experts in the
field of addictions are presently purporting
that between 3 and 6 percent of the world’s
population (193 to 386 million people) are
presently affected by a sexual dependency or
compulsivity (Carnes, 2005). Sexual
dependency is a diagnosable and treatable
disease, which today is generally, regarded
in about the same way that alcoholism and
drug addiction (chemical dependency) was
regarded 40 years ago. Even so, there still
exists a wide range of understandable
misunderstandings about compulsive sexual
acting out, created out of ignorance about
the nature of sexual addiction, and
supported and perpetuated by the
multibillion dollar pornography industry.
Sexual
Dependency - is a global term that covers a
wide range of maladaptive and self-defeating
behavior patterns and relationships such as:
1. Love
Addiction – a disorder in which individuals
repeatedly become involved in enmeshed,
intense, codependent relationships, even
when those relationships or partners are
destructive;
2. Romance
Addiction - a disorder in which individuals
become obsessed with the intrigue and the
pursuit of romance and thrive on the thrill
of the chase, but find it impossible to
sustain a committed, intimate relationship
with another person;
3. Sexual
Anorexia – a disorder in which individuals
become dominated and obsessed with the
emotional, physical, and mental task of
avoiding sex; and
4. Sex
Addiction – a disorder in which individuals
become obsessed with sexually-related,
compulsive self-defeating maladaptive
behavior.
But can one
really be addicted to love as the popular
80’s song proclaims? In a recent research
study, (Aron, A. 2005) published in the June
issue of the Journal of Neurophysiology,
researchers used functional MRI to watch the
real-time brain activity of 17 college
students (10 women, seven men), all of whom
were in the early weeks or months of new
love. These researchers concluded that, love
may vie for the same real estate in the
brain as drug addiction. “Early love, rooted
as it is in the caudate nucleus, is all
about addiction.” "It is a drug addiction."
"It's certainly got some of the main
characteristics of drug addiction -- as with
drugs, once you fall in love you need that
person more and more, so much so that, after
a while, you have to marry them. There are
other things, too -- real dependence,
personality changes, withdrawal symptoms."
“And just like the need for cocaine or
heroin, love can make people do crazy,
sometimes dangerous things.” According to
Aron (2005), the findings help explain
instances where people fall in love with
people they aren’t even sexually attracted
to; or why others can feel equally strong,
sudden emotion for a newborn child or even
God.
So does
this mean that all people who are newly in
love have an addiction? Are all men who look
at pornography addicted? Are all women who
read romance novels addicted? Are all people
who avoid sex considered sexual anorexics?
No, no, no, and no. Then how can we
differentiate between addiction and healthy
relationships? Like other forms of addictive
diseases and lifestyle disorders such as
chemical dependency, pathological gambling,
eating disorders, and religious addiction -
Sexual
dependency is characterized by an addictive
cycle of:
1.
Obsession or preoccupation;
2.
Ritualization;
3.
Compulsive behaviors;
4. Loss of
control and despair; and
5. Shame
and guilt that perpetuates a maladaptive
belief system of impaired thinking and
unmanageability.
Typically,
sexual addictive patterns are considered
pathological problems when issues concerning
sexual behaviors become the focus of life,
causing feelings of shame, guilt, and
embarrassment with related symptoms of
depression and anxiety that cause
significant maladaptive social and/ or
occupational impairment in functioning.
Addicts don’t use sex for affection or
recreation, but for the management of
anxiety and/ or emotional pain.
We must
consider that some people develop
dependencies on certain life-functioning
activities such as sex that can be just as
life threatening as drug addiction and just
as socially and psychologically damaging as
alcoholism.
Sexual
addiction takes many forms with various
levels of severity to include:
1.
Controversial behaviors (obsessions with
pornography, and sex with strangers to
engaging in cyber-sex);
2.
Unacceptable behaviors (exhibitionism,
voyeurism, indecent phone calls); and
3. Profound
Sex offender behaviors (rape, incest, and
child molestation).
Though
solitary forms of this addiction may not be
overtly risky, they can be part of a pattern
of distorted thinking and identity conflict
that can escalate to involve harming the
self and others. An example of a Sexual
Disorder (NOS) or Not Otherwise Specified in
the DSM-IV-TR, (2000) includes: distress
about a pattern of repeated sexual
relationships involving a succession of
lovers who are experienced by an individual
only as things to be used. (It should be
noted that the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders has never used
the word “addiction” to describe any of its
disorders). The defining elements of this
kind of addiction are its secrecy and
escalating nature, often resulting in
diminished judgment and self-control
(Carnes, 1994).
Brief
History of Sex Addiction
In 1976, a
suburban hospital administrator asked Dr.
Patrick Carnes to start an experimental
program for chemically dependent families.
The theoretical constructs of the program
originated in general systems theory,
especially as it applied to families and the
12-steps of Alcoholics Anonymous. One of the
many factors which stood out from a family
perspective was that the addictive
compulsivity had many forms other than
alcohol and drug abuse including overeating,
gambling, shoplifting, and sexuality.
Members of groups like Overeaters Anonymous
and Gamblers Anonymous had already pioneered
in applying the 12-steps to other addictions
so the Family Renewal Center extended its
programming based on the 12-steps, to sexual
addiction.
In 1983,
Dr. Patrick Carnes formally introduced the
concept of sexual addiction to the world in
a text entitled “Out of the Shadows.” Since
then the field of sexual addiction and
compulsive sexual behavior has developed
dramatically. Terms such as addiction,
compulsivity, hyper-sexuality, and “Don
Juanism,” all have been used to describe
what generically could be called "out of
control sexual behavior." Regardless of its
name, clinicians from all fields agree that
a syndrome exists in which individuals have
a sense that they have lost control over
their sexual behavior.
According
to the Society for the Advancement of Sexual
Health (SASH), sexual addiction is a
persistent and escalating pattern or
patterns of sexual behaviors acted out
despite increasingly negative consequences
to self or others. The fundamental nature of
all addiction is the addicts' experience of
helplessness and powerlessness over an
obsessive-compulsive behavior, resulting in
their lives becoming unmanageable. The
addict may be out of control. They may
experience extreme emotional pain and shame.
They may repeatedly fail to control their
behavior. They may suffer one or more of the
following consequences of an unmanageable
lifestyle: a deterioration of some or all
supportive relationships; difficulties with
work, financial troubles; and physical,
mental, and/ or emotional exhaustion which
sometimes leads to psychiatric problems and
hospitalization. Addictions tend to arise
from the same backgrounds: families with
co-dependency including multiple addictions;
lack of effective parenting; and other forms
of physical, emotional and sexual trauma in
childhood.
The Society
for the Advancement of Sexual Health (SASH,
2005) report that the symptoms of sexual
compulsivity often accompany other addictive
behaviors:
Alcohol and
Drug Addiction – Alcohol and drugs alter
libido, enhancing it early in drug addiction
and inhibiting it later. There is a pattern
in cocaine addiction of selling sexual
favors for cocaine. As the cost of drug
addiction increases, the drug addict usually
can't afford the drug from ordinary job
income, and must resort to (either/or)
stealing, drug dealing or prostitution to
support their habit. Alcohol and many drugs
cause blackouts or amnesia during the drug
using experience, and if sex is coupled with
that drug using experience then the details
of the sexual experience may not be
remembered.
Food
Addiction - Sexual anorexia or pathological
self-denial of healthy sex is a frequent
accompaniment of overeating and anorexia
nervosa.
Pathological Gambling - The lifestyle of the
gambler often includes hyper-sexuality,
where both compulsions feed the false sense
of self-esteem of the addict.
Religious
Addiction - Compulsive religiosity sometimes
accompanies sexual addiction as the sex
addict is seeking religion to lessen guilt
and shame. The beginnings of compulsive
religiosity may signal the onset of a period
of sexual anorexia.
Multiple
Addictions
Since it is
impossible to expect treatment for one
addiction to be beneficial when other
addictions co-exist, the initial therapeutic
intervention for any addiction needs to
include an assessment for other addictions.
National surveys revealed that a very high
correlation exists between sexual addiction
and other substance abuse and behavioral
addictions. Sexual addicts who have reported
experiencing multiple addictions include
sexual addiction and:
* Chemical
dependency (42%)
* Eating
disorder (38%)
*
Compulsive working (28%)
*
Compulsive spending (26%)
*
Compulsive gambling (5%)
* Poor
Prognosis
We have
come to realize today more than any other
time in history that the treatment of
lifestyle diseases and addictions are often
a difficult and frustrating task for all
concerned. Repeated failures abound with all
of the addictions, even with utilizing the
most effective treatment strategies. But why
do 47% of patients treated in private
addiction treatment programs (for example)
relapse within the first year following
treatment (Gorski, T., 2001)? Have addiction
specialists become conditioned to accept
failure as the norm? There are many reasons
for this poor prognosis. Some would proclaim
that addictions are psychosomatically-
induced and maintained in a semi-balanced
force field of driving and restraining
multidimensional forces. Others would say
that failures are due simply to a lack of
self-motivation or will power. Most would
agree that lifestyle behavioral addictions
are serious health risks that deserve our
attention, but could it possibly be that
patients with multiple addictions are being
under diagnosed (with a single dependence)
simply due to a lack of diagnostic tools and
resources that are incapable of resolving
the complexity of assessing and treating a
patient with multiple addictions?
Diagnostic
Delineation
Thus far,
the DSM-IV-TR has not delineated a diagnosis
for the complexity of multiple behavioral
and substance addictions. It has reserved
the Poly-substance Dependence diagnosis for
a person who is repeatedly using at least
three groups of substances during the same
12-month period, but the criteria for this
diagnosis do not involve any behavioral
addiction symptoms. In the Psychological
Factors Affecting Medical Condition’s
section (DSM-IV-TR, 2000); maladaptive
health behaviors (e.g., unsafe sexual
practices, excessive alcohol, drug use, and
over eating, etc.) may be listed on Axis I,
only if they are significantly affecting the
course of treatment of a medical or mental
condition.
Since
successful treatment outcomes are dependent
on thorough assessments, accurate diagnoses,
and comprehensive individualized treatment
planning, it is no wonder that repeated
rehabilitation failures and low success
rates are the norm instead of the exception
in the addictions field, when the latest
DSM-IV-TR does not even include a diagnosis
for multiple addictive behavioral disorders.
Treatment clinics need to have a treatment
planning system and referral network that is
equipped to thoroughly assess multiple
addictive and mental health disorders and
related treatment needs and comprehensively
provide education/ awareness, prevention
strategy groups, and/ or specific addictions
treatment services for individuals diagnosed
with multiple addictions. Written treatment
goals and objectives should be specified for
each separate addiction and dimension of an
individuals’ life, and the desired
performance outcome or completion criteria
should be specifically stated, behaviorally
based (a visible activity), and measurable.
New
Proposed Diagnosis
To assist
in resolving the limited DSM-IV-TRs’
diagnostic capability, a multidimensional
diagnosis of “Poly-behavioral Addiction,” is
proposed for more accurate diagnosis leading
to more effective treatment planning. This
diagnosis encompasses the broadest category
of addictive disorders that would include an
individual manifesting a combination of
substance abuse addictions, and other
obsessively-compulsive behavioral addictive
behavioral patterns to pathological
gambling, religion, and/ or sex /
pornography, etc.). Behavioral addictions
are just as damaging - psychologically and
socially as alcohol and drug abuse. They are
comparative to other life-style diseases
such as diabetes, hypertension, and heart
disease in their behavioral manifestations,
their etiologies, and their resistance to
treatments. They are progressive disorders
that involve obsessive thinking and
compulsive behaviors. They are also
characterized by a preoccupation with a
continuous or periodic loss of control, and
continuous irrational behavior in spite of
adverse consequences.
Poly-behavioral addiction would be described
as a state of periodic or chronic physical,
mental, emotional, cultural, sexual and/ or
spiritual/ religious intoxication. These
various types of intoxication are produced
by repeated obsessive thoughts and
compulsive practices involved in
pathological relationships to any
mood-altering substance, person,
organization, belief system, and/ or
activity. The individual has an overpowering
desire, need or compulsion with the presence
of a tendency to intensify their adherence
to these practices, and evidence of
phenomena of tolerance, abstinence and
withdrawal, in which there is always
physical and/ or psychic dependence on the
effects of this pathological relationship.
In addition, there is a 12 - month period in
which an individual is pathologically
involved with three or more behavioral and/
or substance use addictions simultaneously,
but the criteria are not met for dependence
for any one addiction in particular
(Slobodzien, J., 2005). In essence,
Poly-behavioral addiction is the
synergistically integrated chronic
dependence on multiple physiologically
addictive substances and behaviors (e.g.,
using/ abusing substances - nicotine,
alcohol, & drugs, and/or acting impulsively
or obsessively compulsive in regards to
gambling, food binging, sex, and/ or
religion, etc.) simultaneously.
Conclusion
Considering
the wide range of sexual behaviors in our
world today, one should always take into
account an individual’s ethnic, cultural,
religious, and social background prior to
making any clinical judgments, and it would
be wise to not over-pathologize in this area
of Sexual Dependency. However, since
successful treatment outcomes are dependent
on thorough assessments, accurate diagnoses,
and comprehensive individualized treatment
planning - poly-behavioral addiction needs
to be identified to effectively treat the
complexity of multiple behavioral and
substance addictions.
Since
chronic lifestyle diseases and disorders
such as diabetes, hypertension, alcoholism,
drug and behavioral addictions cannot be
cured, but only managed - how should we
effectively manage poly-behavioral
addiction?
The
Addiction Recovery Measurement System (ARMS)
is proposed utilizing a multidimensional
integrative assessment, treatment planning,
treatment progress, and treatment outcome
measurement tracking system that facilitates
rapid and accurate recognition and
evaluation of an individual’s comprehensive
life-functioning progress dimensions. The
ARMS hypothesis purports that there is a
multidimensional synergistically negative
resistance that individual’s develop to any
one form of treatment to a single dimension
of their lives, because the effects of an
individual’s addiction have dynamically
interacted multi-dimensionally. Having the
primary focus on one dimension is
insufficient. Traditionally, addiction
treatment programs have failed to
accommodate for the multidimensional
synergistically negative effects of an
individual having multiple addictions, (e.g.
nicotine, alcohol, and obesity, etc.).
Behavioral addictions interact negatively
with each other and with strategies to
improve overall functioning. They tend to
encourage the use of tobacco, alcohol and
other drugs, help increase violence,
decrease functional capacity, and promote
social isolation. Most treatment theories
today involve assessing other dimensions to
identify dual diagnosis or co-morbidity
diagnoses, or to assess contributing factors
that may play a role in the individual’s
primary addiction. The ARMS’ theory
proclaims that a multidimensional treatment
plan must be devised addressing the possible
multiple addictions identified for each one
of an individual’s life dimensions in
addition to developing specific goals and
objectives for each dimension.
Partnerships and coordination among service
providers, government departments, and
community organizations in providing
addiction treatment programs are a necessity
in addressing the multi-task solution to
poly-behavioral addiction. I encourage you
to support the addiction programs in
America, and hope that the (ARMS) resources
can assist you to personally fight the War
on poly-behavioral addiction.
For more
info see: Poly-Behavioral Addiction and the
Addictions Recovery Measurement System
(ARMS) By James Slobodzien, Psy.D. CSAC at:
http://www.geocities.com/drslbdzn/Behavioral_Addictions.html
National Council on Sexual Addiction &
Compulsivity
P.O. Box 725544
Atlanta, GA 31139
(770) 541-9912
http://www.ncsac.org
Sexual Addiction Resources
http://www.sexhelp.com
References
American
Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,
Fourth Edition, Text Revision. Washington,
DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2000,
p. 787 & p. 731. American Society of
Addiction Medicine’s (2003), “Patient
Placement Criteria for the Treatment of
Substance-Related Disorders, 3rd Edition,
Retrieved, June 18, 2005, from:
http://www.asam.org/ Arthur Aron, Ph.D.,
professor, psychology, State University of
New York, Stony Brook; Helen Fisher,
research professor, department of
anthropology, Rutgers University, New
Brunswick, N.J.; Paul Sanberg,
Ph.D.,professor, neuroscience, and director,
Center of Excellence for Aging and Brain
Repair,University of South Florida College
of Medicine, Tampa; June 2005, the Journal
of Neurophysiology Carnes, P.J. (1983). Out
of the Shadows: Understanding Sexual
Addiction. Minneapolis, MN: Compcare.
Carnes, P.J. (1989). Contrary to Love:
Helping the Sexual Addict. Minneapolis, MN:
Compcare. Carnes, P.J. (1991). Don't Call it
Love. Minneapolis, MN: Gentle Press
Publishing. Carnes, P.J. (1997). Sexual
Anorexia: Overcoming Sexual Self-hatred.
Center City, MN: Hazelden. Carnes, P.J., &
Delmonico, D.L. (1994). Sexual Dependency
Inventory. Wickenburg, AZ: The Meadows
Institute. Carnes, P.J., Delmonico, D.L., &
Griffin, E. J. (2001). In the Shadows of the
Net: Breaking Free of Compulsive Online
Sexual Behavior. Center City, MN: Hazelden.
Delmonico, D.L. (1997). Internet Sex
Screening Test. [Online]. Available at:
http://www.sexhelp.com Delmonico, D.L.,
Griffin, E.J., & Moriarity, J. (2001).
Cybersex Unhooked: A Workbook for Breaking
Free From Online Compulsive Sexual Behavior.
Wickenburg, AZ: Gentle Path Press. Gorski,
T. (2001), Relapse Prevention In The Managed
Care Environment. GORSKI-CENAPS Web
Publications. Retrieved June 20, 2005, from:
www.tgorski.com Lienard, J. & Vamecq, J.
(2004), Presse Med, Oct 23;33(18
Suppl):33-40. Marlatt, G. A. (1985). Relapse
prevention: Theoretical rationale and
overview of the model. In G. A. Marlatt & J.
R. Gordon (Eds.), Relapse prevention (pp.
250-280). New York: Guilford Press.
Schneider, J.P. (1994). Sex addiction:
Controversy within mainstream addiction
medicine, diagnosis based on the DSV-III-R
and physician case histories. Sexual
Addiction & Compulsivity: Journal of
Treatment and Prevention, 1(1), 19-44.
Slobodzien, J. (2005). Poly-behavioral
Addiction and the Addictions Recovery
Measurement System (ARMS), Booklocker.com,
Inc., p. 5.
James Slobodzien, Psy.D.
CSAC, is a Hawaii licensed
psychologist and certified
substance abuse counselor
who earned his doctorate in
Clinical Psychology. The
National Registry of Health
Service Providers in
Psychology credentials Dr.
Slobodzien. He has over
20-years of mental health
experience primarily working
in the fields of alcohol/
substance abuse and
behavioral addictions in
medical, correctional, and
judicial settings. He is an
adjunct professor of
Psychology and also
maintains a private practice
as a mental health
consultant.
Article
Source:
http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=James_Slobodzien
|